Most Business Plans Are Fiction
A detailed five-year plan projects false precision onto a future nobody can see. The document looks like rigor; mostly it is confident guessing in a spreadsheet.
Most business plans are fiction. Not dishonest fiction. Sincere, well-intentioned fiction. A business plan is a document many founders rely on. The detailed five-year plan with tidy projections tells a comforting story. It creates a sense of certainty about a future nobody can actually see.
The danger is not that the plan is wrong. Every plan is wrong. The danger is that a thick, confident document feels right. Founders follow it off a cliff. Reality was already giving warnings.
Why the conventional wisdom is wrong
The conventional wisdom says a serious business needs a serious plan. The more detailed it is, the more credible it seems. So founders produce thirty-page documents. These include five-year revenue curves and market-share projections. But detail is not the same as accuracy. A precise projection about an unknown future is not rigorous. It is just more confidently wrong. That precision makes the error harder to question.
The five-year revenue chart is a guess dressed as a forecast. The decimal places add credibility, not truth.
The plan assumes the market, competitors, and customers will behave as written. The only certainty is that they will not.
Energy goes into perfecting the document instead of testing the riskiest assumptions against reality.
Once the plan exists it becomes a thing to defend. Founders cling to it as the evidence piles up that it is wrong.
What is actually true
The value of planning is in the thinking, not the document. Confronting assumptions, pressure-testing the model, and deciding what must be true is genuinely useful. But the artifact it produces becomes nearly worthless fast. Reality immediately begins violating the assumptions the plan was built on. Founders who win are not the ones with the best plan. They are the ones who plan in order to learn. Then they adapt fast when reality disagrees.
The founders who swear by their business plan often succeeded by abandoning it. The plan got them to start. The pivot got them to work. What mattered was never predicting the future correctly. It was building an organization that could notice reality quickly and change course.
What a plan is actually good for
Planning is worth doing. Hold the output loosely and use it for what it is actually good at.
Forcing assumptions into the open, so the ones the whole business depends on can be tested.
Pressure-testing the model's logic. Checking whether this even works on paper before betting real money on it.
Aligning a team on direction and the few near-term moves, not on a fictional number three years out.
Identifying the riskiest unknowns to validate next, then updating the moment something real is learned.
What the industry has seen
Successful agencies and startups rarely follow a five-year plan. They hold a clear direction. They pay close attention to what is actually happening. They change course when reality demands it. Early detailed plans become obsolete within months. Not because the planning was poor, but because that is what plans do. When founders arrive with a thick business plan, the most valuable help is often this: hold it loosely. Keep the thinking. Ditch the false precision. Build the habit of adapting. The companies that have struggled were rarely the ones without a plan. They were the ones too committed to a plan reality had already disproven.
The honest take
Plan, but do not confuse the document with the truth. The thinking that goes into a plan is valuable. The thick, precise, five-year artifact it produces is mostly fiction. Treating it as fact is how good founders march confidently in the wrong direction. Make assumptions explicit. Test the riskiest ones. Align on the next real moves. Then stay alert to what actually happens and adapt without shame. The goal was never to predict the future correctly. It was to build something that survives being wrong about it.
Sources
CB Insights - analysis of why startups fail, including building on assumptions the market never confirmed. cbinsights.com
Harvard Business Review - research on strategic planning versus adaptability in uncertain environments. hbr.org
TTGC - experience advising founders on planning and business strategy.
Ready to work with Through The Glass Creatives?
Book a free Brand and Growth Assessment and see exactly how the TTGC team would approach it.
Related reading: Strategy That Ships vs. Strategy in a Deck · Most Transformation Projects Fail Before Launch
