Book My Growth Assessment
insights

Ranking #1 Can Be a Waste of Money

The number one spot is treated as the finish line of SEO. For many businesses, fighting for it is one of the worst possible uses of a budget.

Mherie Vic Palomo Prevendido
Mherie Vic Palomo Prevendido·May 5, 2025·3 min read
17+ industry awards · SEO, Paid Ads & Brand Growth
Share
Ranking #1 Can Be a Waste of Money

Ask almost any business owner what they want from SEO and they will say the same thing: "I want to rank number one." It is the goal everyone has internalized, the trophy that supposedly proves the strategy is working. So here is the contrarian truth we tell clients: ranking number one can be a complete waste of money.

Position is not the same as profit. The top spot for the wrong term, or a term you cannot realistically win, can drain a budget that would have earned far more pointed somewhere else.

Why the conventional wisdom is wrong

The fixation on the number one position treats all keywords as equally worth winning. They are not. Some terms are so competitive that reaching the top costs more than the customers it brings are worth. Others have so little commercial intent that even the top spot delivers traffic that never converts. And some terms are dominated by ads, AI overviews, and map packs that push the number one organic result so far down that "ranking first" means almost nothing.

The most competitive head terms can cost years and a fortune to win, with a payback that never arrives.

Some number one rankings sit below ads, an AI answer box, and a map pack — invisible to most searchers.

A high-intent term ranked third often out-earns a low-intent term ranked first.

What is actually true

The right goal is not the highest ranking — it is the highest return. Position only matters in service of revenue, and the math changes term by term. A cluster of less glamorous, lower-competition keywords with strong buying intent will frequently beat a single prestige term, because you can win all of them for the cost of fighting for one, and every one of them brings a buyer. Spreading a budget across winnable, high-intent terms beats burning it on a single trophy.

There is also the question of where number one actually is. On a modern results page, "first" can mean fourth on the screen. Winning a position nobody scrolls to is a hollow victory you still paid full price for.

When number one is worth it — and when it isn't

The honest version of this advice is not "never aim for number one." It is "do the math first." The top spot is worth pursuing when the term has real buying intent, the competition is beatable with your resources, and the position sits where searchers actually look. It is a waste when any of those is false.

Worth it: a high-intent term you can realistically win, where the top result is genuinely visible.

Waste: a vanity head term you will spend years and a fortune chasing for traffic that may never convert.

What we see at TTGC

We have talked clients out of expensive number one ambitions more times than we can count. A client fixated on owning the single biggest keyword in their category often does far better when we redirect that budget into a portfolio of winnable, buyer-intent terms. We would rather a client own twenty searches that each bring a customer than burn the year chasing one search that brings applause. Telling a client their dream keyword is a bad investment is not what they want to hear — but it is what grows their revenue.

The honest take

Number one is a vanity metric dressed up as a goal. The businesses that win at search are not the ones with the most trophies — they are the ones who pointed their budget at the rankings that pay. Before you spend a cent chasing the top spot, ask whether that spot will actually make you money. Often the honest answer is no, and the better investment is somewhere less glamorous and far more profitable.

Sources

Google Search Central — on SERP features and how results are displayed. developers.google.com/search

Moz — on keyword difficulty and value. moz.com

TTGC SEO practice — ROI-vs-ranking patterns across client engagements.

Results shared by Through The Glass Creatives Global and its founders are not typical and are not a guarantee of your success. Ravve Jay Prevendido and Mherie Vic Palomo Prevendido are experienced business owners, and your results will vary depending on your industry, effort, application, experience, and market conditions. We do not guarantee that you will achieve specific outcomes by using our services. Consequently, your results may significantly vary. We do not give investment, tax, or other financial advice. Case studies and client experiences are mentioned for informational purposes only. The information contained within this website is the property of Through The Glass Creatives Global - FZCO. Any use of the images, content, or ideas expressed herein without the express written consent of Through The Glass Creatives Global FZCO is prohibited. Copyright © 2026 Through The Glass Creatives Global FZCO. All Rights Reserved.