insights

What Agency RFPs Get Wrong: A Better Selection Guide

Build a fair agency RFP through outcomes, constraints, discovery, comparable evidence, paid work, scoring, conflicts, security, references, clarification, negotiation, and transition.

Mherie Vic Palomo Prevendido
Mherie Vic Palomo Prevendido·Jun 5, 2026·5 min read
17+ industry awards · SEO, Paid Ads & Brand Growth · mherievic.com
Share
What Agency RFPs Get Wrong: A Better Selection Guide

An RFP can help you pick a good agency. It can also reward polish, low bids, or bold guesses. That happens when the brief is weak. There is no proof that most RFPs fail. There is no proof that the best agencies say no to them. Build a process that gives every bidder the same real need to answer. Then ask each one to show proof that fits.

Start With the Decision the RFP Must Support

What work, result, or skill are you buying?

Why is the work needed now?

What is fixed? What can change?

Who decides, uses, approves, pays for, and backs the work?

Which risks, laws, systems, data, brands, and partners matter?

What proof would help the team choose and back that choice?

Share the Real Context

Where things stand now. Known faults. Past work. Research. Open questions.

Who you serve. The market, the offer, the users, the staff, the service.

What is in scope. What is out. What it leans on. The limits. What the client must do.

A budget range. Or the thinking behind the budget you approved, if the rules allow it.

Target dates. Hard events. Review time. The path to a yes or a no.

Access, security, privacy, legal, buying, and contract needs.

Facts about the current agency, in-house teams, conflicts, and handover.

Do Discovery Before Asking for a Solution

Maybe the buyer does not yet know the problem. If so, buy or run a short discovery stage first. Do not ask several firms to build a full strategy for free. A bidder can show its method, its questions, its team, the risks, and past work that fits. New strategy made for your brand should come with clear rights, time, and pay.

Ask for Comparable Evidence

Past work that fits. Show the real role, scope, team, time, and client consent.

How they deliver. What goes in, who checks, who approves, how changes work.

The team they propose. Who is free, where they sit, which partners, who owns what.

Risks, assumptions, what is left out, what it leans on, and where change is likely.

Fees or how fees are set. Outside costs, payment terms, and change terms.

Security, privacy, access, data, ownership, support, and how they exit.

References. Ask them all the same fair questions, with permission in hand.

Use a Paid Work Sample Only When It Adds Real Evidence

A short paid task can help when past work cannot show the key skill. Give each finalist the same task, time, inputs, fee, rights, and scoring. Do not put spec work in a live product without a separate deal. And do not ask for a full campaign, design system, strategy, or prototype as a free audition.

Publish the Scoring Method

Fit with the need and the limits you stated.

How good the proof is, and how well it fits.

A clear team, with clear roles.

Method, risk, oversight, and change control.

Security, privacy, access for all, ownership, and support.

Total cost once scored, not just the headline fee.

Proof from interviews, references, and paid tasks, where you use them.

Set the weights before the bids come in. Say what a strong, mixed, and weak answer looks like. Ask each scorer to note the proof behind the score, not just a number. Write down conflicts. Do not shift weights to help a bidder once you have seen the bids.

Use a Plain Scorecard

Write one row for each thing that must be true.

Give each row a weight before bids come in.

Ask each judge to cite the proof behind the score.

Mark a gap when the bid shows no proof.

Talk through big gaps between judges.

Keep notes on risks, doubts, and facts to check.

Do not let one great pitch cover a weak work plan.

Do not let one low fee cover a high risk of poor delivery.

Run Fair Clarification

Give all bidders the same core brief and the same updates.

Use one question window. Share answers that affect everyone.

Say what may stay private, because it holds a bidder's own method.

Hold interviews with the people who would do the work.

Ask the same core questions. Allow clear follow-up.

Fix your own mistake. Do not score bidders against it.

Check More Than the Pitch

Call references that fit. Use the same set of questions.

Check who did the work they show. Then check who will do yours.

Review proof of finances, insurance, security, legal, and policy as needed.

Test how the team deals with doubt, conflict, and a fact that changes.

Review sample reports, plans, records, or demos with client facts taken out.

Do not read delivery skill into awards, fame, office size, or pitch style.

Negotiate Scope and Transition

Agree on results, outputs, scope, what is out, roles, and client inputs.

Set rules for decisions, approval, sign-off, change, delay, and escalation.

State the fee, payment, expenses, outside costs, and tax.

Set ownership, licence, source files, accounts, data, access, and handoff.

Define support, service levels, incidents, exit, export, and deletion.

Write down why you made the award. Then tell bidders under the stated process.

A Bounded Hypothetical

Say a buyer needs a new service site but has no clear page map. It buys a short discovery phase first. Three firms then get the same findings, budget range, limits, and scorecard. Finalists do one paid task on content and page flow. The buyer writes down the proof and the tradeoffs. This cannot promise the best partner. But it does make the choice easy to test and defend.

The Short Answer

A sound agency RFP names the choice it must support. It shares real context. It asks for proof you can compare. Run discovery before you ask for detailed plans. Pay for new work samples. Publish how you will score. Run fair clarification. Check the team that will deliver. Then agree on ownership and exit. Do not assume a polished pitch or the lowest fee proves fit.

Need an agency brief and selection scorecard?

TTGC can help map outcomes, context, discovery, evidence, paid tasks, scoring, interviews, references, risk, fees, ownership, support, and transition. We do not guarantee the best bidder, project result, savings, growth, or return.

Get Your Free AssessmentGet Your Free Assessment

Sources

  1. UK Cabinet Office — The Sourcing Playbook. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-sourcing-and-consultancy-playbooks
  2. UK Government — Consultancy Playbook. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/consultancy-playbook
  3. NIST — Secure Software Development Framework. https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/218/final
  4. W3C — Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/

Results shared by Through The Glass Creatives Global and its founders are not typical and are not a guarantee of your success. Ravve Jay Prevendido and Mherie Vic Palomo Prevendido are experienced business owners, and your results will vary depending on your industry, effort, application, experience, and market conditions. We do not guarantee that you will achieve specific outcomes by using our services. Consequently, your results may significantly vary. We do not give investment, tax, or other financial advice. Case studies and client experiences are mentioned for informational purposes only. The information contained within this website is the property of Through The Glass Creatives Global - FZCO. Any use of the images, content, or ideas expressed herein without the express written consent of Through The Glass Creatives Global FZCO is prohibited. Copyright © 2026 Through The Glass Creatives Global FZCO. All Rights Reserved.